Phosphorous: a vital ingredient in
fertilisers, which have become a necessity in food production.
Intensive agriculture has received bad
press in recent years for its detrimental effects on the environment, and
particularly on aquatic ecosystems. Eutrophication is becoming increasingly
commonplace, causing severe environmental change across the globe. For a little
reminder, take a peek at http://www.lakescientist.com/learn-about-lakes/water-quality/eutrophication.html.
The role of phosphorous in this process is
a significant one, but the problem of phosphorous leakage from agricultural
land into aquatic systems is double-edged. Firstly, the resulting eutrophication
causes biodiversity loss and food web simplification, making the ecosystem more
vulnerable to other forms of environmental change. But coupled with this is the
issue of a growing population. Currently, food cannot be produced at current
global levels without the use of artificial fertilisers, and with an estimated
2-2.5 billion new mouths to feed by 2050 our global demand for phosphorous will
only increase.
But is there a way we can solve these two
problems, in order to avoid further environmental change into the future? Some researchers seem to think so (http://www.agci.org/dB/PDFs/09S2_TCrews_StoryofP.pdf)!
Nearly 100% of the phosphorous eaten in
food is excreted, which translates to 3 million tonnes of phosphorous lost down
the toilets of the global population every year! So if this phosphorous is
recovered and reused before it reaches aquatic systems, eutrophication can be
significantly reduced. Moreover, recovery will reduce phosphorous wastage,
helping to preserve finite reserves of rock phosphate – from which phosphorous
for fertilisers is derived – that would otherwise be exhausted in the next 50
years or so.
So, if we save our wee we could save the
world!
Of course, this won’t prevent leakage directly from agricultural land, and my personal opinion is that this is where we should focus in order to really address the problems of damaging environmental change in aquatic systems.
Of course, this won’t prevent leakage directly from agricultural land, and my personal opinion is that this is where we should focus in order to really address the problems of damaging environmental change in aquatic systems.
Have you come across the concept of "peak phosphorus"? This concept fits with this debate, although it is highly contentious...
ReplyDeleteI hope to continue the discussion around phosphorous in the coming weeks, with the idea of "peak phosphorous" feeding into these discussions. I agree that the concept is a contentious one, and I shall explore the ways in which the concept has been proposed, evaluated, and debated. Watch this space!
Delete