Recently I have been reading some interesting articles on global
biodiversity scenarios for my ‘Global Environmental Change’ module (the module
for which I started this blog). As I have been discussing fairly specific
topics in my last few posts I thought this was a perfect opportunity to get my
head out of the hives (see previous posts if you’re struggling with that pun…) and talk more generally about
environmental change.
By now most of us realise that with environmental changes come changes
to biodiversity levels. In a paper written by Henrique Pereira and his
colleagues habitat loss is picked out as a key metric for biodiversity change, with
land-use a dominant driver of change in terrestrial systems. Straight away my
ears pricked up and the light bulb appeared over my head…agricultural
expansion!
Agriculture is a key land-use across the globe, and throughout history
it has expanded to enable growing world populations to meet their food production
demands. Quantitative scenarios still hold the conversion of natural and
semi-natural habitats into agricultural landscapes as a substantial contributor
to future global biodiversity changes. As conversion can often lead to habitat
loss and degradation it is hardly surprising agriculture plays such a large
role in global environmental change.
Pereira and his colleagues highlighted conversion of forest to
agricultural systems as the most important habitat change affecting global
biodiversity levels, with particular losses occurring in the tropics. In the
western world such conversions are no longer extensive, and are in fact in
reverse due to overall gains in forest. However, these gains cannot directly
compensate for forest losses in temperate regions in terms of biodiversity, as
the forest habitats of the northern hemisphere support comparatively lower
levels of biodiversity than those in tropical and subtropical regions. This is
reflected in the fact that models of global biodiversity scenarios still suggest
species declines in terrestrial systems.
![]() |
Deforestation, to make space for agriculture, in Brazil (source: forestjustice.org) |
One issue I am taking from this is that no matter what regulation
changes are taken in the developed world to improve agricultural practices in
terms of environmental sensitivity, or even those to restrict agricultural
intensification and expansion, global biodiversity levels are still facing a
future of decline. Agriculture is a global phenomenon, with global impacts, and
hence any attempts to drive improvements in the health (and future) of the natural
environment through changes to agriculture must be implemented on a global
scale. This is where geopolitics becomes hugely relevant, but that is more the
realm of a human geographer!
No comments:
Post a Comment