‘The Green Revolution’ refers to the
renovation of agricultural practices, which started in Mexico in the 1940s. Its
success in increasing agricultural production saw these technologies spread
across the globe in the second half of the 20th Century. The
combined role of fertilisers and irrigation in making such a revolution
possible cannot be ignored, as these allowed for new high yielding crop
varieties to be grown and permitted an expansion of agriculture to new land
areas. Now, croplands and pastures have become one of the largest terrestrial
biomes on the planet, rivalling forest cover in extent by occupying
approximately 40% of the globe’s land surface.
A farmer gathering wheat in Bamiyan, Afghanistan. (Source: UN) |
However, despite its success in increasing crop
production and combatting starvation – so much so that with continued
population growth a second revolution is being called for – there are some real
issues that should be discussed. This agricultural revolution has caused
extensive environmental damage, and a second phase is likely to elevate these
changes and propagate them to new parts of the globe. The change in land-use, with a loss of native habitats, is not only of concern in
relation to biodiversity loss but also because this affects agricultural
production itself. The simplification of ecosystems suppresses the ecological
services a biodiverse landscape provides, undermining agriculture. One such example is a degradation of pollination
services, with bees of particular significance in this respect.
In short, modern agricultural land-use
practices promoted by the Green Revolution may be trading short-term increases
in food production for longer-term losses in ecosystem services, some of which
are pivotal for the longevity of agricultural production. I very much support
the assertion that we cannot continue to acquire and exploit natural resources
for immediate human needs at the expense of degrading environmental conditions
and ecosystem capacities. Indeed, with population pressures projected to
increase, some form of advancement in food production must take place, but such
advancement must be conscientious to the natural environment and take a
long-term view in assessing the sustainability of any possible changes to
land-use.
No comments:
Post a Comment